Discussion:
FCC Approval for Automatic Transfer Switch
(too old to reply)
b***@govarion.com
2007-05-24 00:40:15 UTC
Permalink
Hello Everyone,

I've searched and searched, but I just can't seem to come up with a
solid answer. I've asked quite a few people that I consider
knowledgeable about FCC Part 68, but I've got some VERY mixed answers
to my question. I'm hoping someone here can at least point me in the
right direction - even if you can't clear up the murky waters.

We're designing an automatic PSTN Failover device. It's basically a
DPDT relay connected to a micro-controller. The micro-controller is
connected to a PBX, and if the PBX Fails, the uC switches the relay so
that a different PBX can take over the line. This is a BIT
simplified, but the relays (I believe) are the only important part of
the equation anyway.

What we need to know, is what FCC rules will govern our device? Does
it even have to be FCC approved since it doesn't have any electrical
circuits in the PSTN line?

Any help, or pointers to FCC rules would be HIGHLY appreciated.

Thanks for your time,
Ben
Terry
2007-05-24 02:42:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by b***@govarion.com
Hello Everyone,
I've searched and searched, but I just can't seem to come up with a
solid answer. I've asked quite a few people that I consider
knowledgeable about FCC Part 68, but I've got some VERY mixed answers
to my question. I'm hoping someone here can at least point me in the
right direction - even if you can't clear up the murky waters.
We're designing an automatic PSTN Failover device. It's basically a
DPDT relay connected to a micro-controller. The micro-controller is
connected to a PBX, and if the PBX Fails, the uC switches the relay so
that a different PBX can take over the line. This is a BIT
simplified, but the relays (I believe) are the only important part of
the equation anyway.
What we need to know, is what FCC rules will govern our device? Does
it even have to be FCC approved since it doesn't have any electrical
circuits in the PSTN line?
Any help, or pointers to FCC rules would be HIGHLY appreciated.
Thanks for your time,
Ben
Ah, the wheel again. Several PBXs back in theMitel SX days had power failure
boxes that do exactly what you want, and must have been certified. Somebody
must still make them. have you looked at the Viking PF-6A ?

TerryS
b***@govarion.com
2007-05-24 03:32:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Terry
Post by b***@govarion.com
Hello Everyone,
I've searched and searched, but I just can't seem to come up with a
solid answer. I've asked quite a few people that I consider
knowledgeable about FCC Part 68, but I've got some VERY mixed answers
to my question. I'm hoping someone here can at least point me in the
right direction - even if you can't clear up the murky waters.
We're designing an automatic PSTN Failover device. It's basically a
DPDT relay connected to a micro-controller. The micro-controller is
connected to a PBX, and if the PBX Fails, the uC switches the relay so
that a different PBX can take over the line. This is a BIT
simplified, but the relays (I believe) are the only important part of
the equation anyway.
What we need to know, is what FCC rules will govern our device? Does
it even have to be FCC approved since it doesn't have any electrical
circuits in the PSTN line?
Any help, or pointers to FCC rules would be HIGHLY appreciated.
Thanks for your time,
Ben
Ah, the wheel again. Several PBXs back in theMitel SX days had power failure
boxes that do exactly what you want, and must have been certified. Somebody
must still make them. have you looked at the Viking PF-6A ?
TerryS- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Thanks for your reply TerryS,

I actually did look at the Viking PF-6A for ideas - good thought.
Unfortunately, from what I can tell anyway, this device is a bit
different than ours.
A) It CONVERTS lines from loop start to ground start - meaning that it
IS the endpoint
B) It monitors the line for use, and only switches during NON-USE -
again, meaning that it does have SOME actual electronics in the path.

Thanks again TerryS - if you see this differently than I do, please
comment. I aprreciate your time to reply!

Ben
Terry
2007-05-24 11:37:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by b***@govarion.com
Post by Terry
Post by b***@govarion.com
Hello Everyone,
I've searched and searched, but I just can't seem to come up with a
solid answer. I've asked quite a few people that I consider
knowledgeable about FCC Part 68, but I've got some VERY mixed answers
to my question. I'm hoping someone here can at least point me in the
right direction - even if you can't clear up the murky waters.
We're designing an automatic PSTN Failover device. It's basically a
DPDT relay connected to a micro-controller. The micro-controller is
connected to a PBX, and if the PBX Fails, the uC switches the relay so
that a different PBX can take over the line. This is a BIT
simplified, but the relays (I believe) are the only important part of
the equation anyway.
What we need to know, is what FCC rules will govern our device? Does
it even have to be FCC approved since it doesn't have any electrical
circuits in the PSTN line?
Any help, or pointers to FCC rules would be HIGHLY appreciated.
Thanks for your time,
Ben
Ah, the wheel again. Several PBXs back in theMitel SX days had power failure
boxes that do exactly what you want, and must have been certified. Somebody
must still make them. have you looked at the Viking PF-6A ?
TerryS- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Thanks for your reply TerryS,
I actually did look at the Viking PF-6A for ideas - good thought.
Unfortunately, from what I can tell anyway, this device is a bit
different than ours.
A) It CONVERTS lines from loop start to ground start - meaning that it
IS the endpoint
B) It monitors the line for use, and only switches during NON-USE -
again, meaning that it does have SOME actual electronics in the path.
Thanks again TerryS - if you see this differently than I do, please
comment. I aprreciate your time to reply!
Ben
The PF-6A can be programmed to not convert and is switchable upon command.
The not switching back until line is idle, if a problem, may be disabled on
order by Viking ? Cheaper than inventing one. How about

http://www.gkinc.com/PDFFiles/BPds_1.pdf

IIRC, there are OEM modules that are Part68 compliant on one side, and you
can do anything you want on the other. I believe I have seen them not to
long ago in a catalog from a large electronic parts distributor. Also in one
of those toy electronic kits that you assemble, the one for making funny
noises on the telephone line had a pre assembled interface.

A really expensive idea is to get a faxswitch "Stick" for each line, do not
apply power, and manipulate your lines at the default output. It passively
complies with Part 68.

TerryS
Al Gillis
2007-05-24 16:13:47 UTC
Permalink
Hi Ben -
You didn't exactly say if you've looked through FCC regulations, Part 68,
which apply to "Connection of Terminal Equipment to the Telephone Network".
Numerous other documents are referenced by Part 68 and that's where you'll
probably find the real answers for your questions. Here's a link to get you
started:
http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_06/47cfr68_06.html

Good luck, pal... You're getting mixed up with the government now!
Post by b***@govarion.com
Hello Everyone,
I've searched and searched, but I just can't seem to come up with a
solid answer. I've asked quite a few people that I consider
knowledgeable about FCC Part 68, but I've got some VERY mixed answers
to my question. I'm hoping someone here can at least point me in the
right direction - even if you can't clear up the murky waters.
We're designing an automatic PSTN Failover device. It's basically a
DPDT relay connected to a micro-controller. The micro-controller is
connected to a PBX, and if the PBX Fails, the uC switches the relay so
that a different PBX can take over the line. This is a BIT
simplified, but the relays (I believe) are the only important part of
the equation anyway.
What we need to know, is what FCC rules will govern our device? Does
it even have to be FCC approved since it doesn't have any electrical
circuits in the PSTN line?
Any help, or pointers to FCC rules would be HIGHLY appreciated.
Thanks for your time,
Ben
Robert Bonomi
2007-05-26 14:25:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by b***@govarion.com
Hello Everyone,
I've searched and searched, but I just can't seem to come up with a
solid answer. I've asked quite a few people that I consider
knowledgeable about FCC Part 68, but I've got some VERY mixed answers
to my question. I'm hoping someone here can at least point me in the
right direction - even if you can't clear up the murky waters.
We're designing an automatic PSTN Failover device. It's basically a
DPDT relay connected to a micro-controller. The micro-controller is
connected to a PBX, and if the PBX Fails, the uC switches the relay so
that a different PBX can take over the line. This is a BIT
simplified, but the relays (I believe) are the only important part of
the equation anyway.
What we need to know, is what FCC rules will govern our device? Does
it even have to be FCC approved since it doesn't have any electrical
circuits in the PSTN line?
Any help, or pointers to FCC rules would be HIGHLY appreciated.
The infamous "Part 68" _will_ apply. it is a device 'directly connected'
to the PSTN. Is there a 'failure mode' of the relay (e.g. damaged insulation)
that 'could' result in 'something else' (e.g. the relay 'power' circuit)
getting on the phone wires?

You can probably find 'certified' relays -- every modem that has an aux
jack for a phone handset has a relay performing -exactly- the same function
as your device -- switching an incoming line between two different CPE.
Loading...