Green Xenon [Radium]
2008-06-19 05:44:53 UTC
Hi:
Please don't get upset at me.
I am currently thinking about an extremely hypothetical form of PSK in
telecommunications technology. This too theoretical-too-be-realistic PSK
uses 1-phase-per-symbol and 1-symbol-per-phone-line-per-second. In PSK,
1-bit allows for 2 phases. So 1-phase assumes half a bit or 2-symbols
per bit. But since only 1-symbol-per-phone-line-per-second is used, the
measurement is phase-per-symbol, not bit-per-symbol. Anyways, this
device attempts to achieve a data rate of Graham's-number amount of
bytes per second by using 2 X 16 X Graham's number amount of telephone
lines. 2, because 1 phase represents only half a bit. 16, because a byte
is made of 8-bits, and no more than one phase [or half-bit] is allowed
per-symbol and no more than 1-symbol-per-phone-line-per-second is
permitted.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham's_number
Now that is a lot of telephone lines! (2 X 16 X Graham's number) lines
If it were possible and feasible for such PSK to exist, what would be
the disadvantages of it?
If I had and audio system that could play this data through a speaker,
what would I hear? Would it sound anything like those V.92 dial-up
modems when the just connect to the internet? Love those dial-up tones!
This scenario is so unrealistic that it can only exist in simulated reality.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulated_reality
Anyways, I call it "extremely parallel" because there is
1-phase-per-line, no more, no less.
Thanks,
Radium
Please don't get upset at me.
I am currently thinking about an extremely hypothetical form of PSK in
telecommunications technology. This too theoretical-too-be-realistic PSK
uses 1-phase-per-symbol and 1-symbol-per-phone-line-per-second. In PSK,
1-bit allows for 2 phases. So 1-phase assumes half a bit or 2-symbols
per bit. But since only 1-symbol-per-phone-line-per-second is used, the
measurement is phase-per-symbol, not bit-per-symbol. Anyways, this
device attempts to achieve a data rate of Graham's-number amount of
bytes per second by using 2 X 16 X Graham's number amount of telephone
lines. 2, because 1 phase represents only half a bit. 16, because a byte
is made of 8-bits, and no more than one phase [or half-bit] is allowed
per-symbol and no more than 1-symbol-per-phone-line-per-second is
permitted.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham's_number
Now that is a lot of telephone lines! (2 X 16 X Graham's number) lines
If it were possible and feasible for such PSK to exist, what would be
the disadvantages of it?
If I had and audio system that could play this data through a speaker,
what would I hear? Would it sound anything like those V.92 dial-up
modems when the just connect to the internet? Love those dial-up tones!
This scenario is so unrealistic that it can only exist in simulated reality.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulated_reality
Anyways, I call it "extremely parallel" because there is
1-phase-per-line, no more, no less.
Thanks,
Radium